|
|
Max
Ernst (1891-1976)
The story of Max Ernst is
the story of european fantasy (John Russell)
About Max Ernst's Art
<
STRONG>
When asked as a child what his favorite activity was,
Max Ernst retorted: 'seeing'. When writing on Max Ernst, the
history of Dada and the overwhelming history of Surrealism must also be explained, as well as
the development of new
art movements in the USA.
The Dada-Max became one of the leading
representatives of Surrealism (like Dalí, Matta, Tanguy and Picabia). Anyone
searching for in-depth information should read John Russel's famous monograph, a well-read
classic. 'Le parquet se
soulève' (The Parquet Rises Up) from 1939 gives the cue, and at the same time
addresses the double-sided, tense
political situation. The future of Europe had not worried Ernst since the Spanish Civil War, on
which he based his
falling airplane paintings, or the series of collages from 1934 for 'Une semaine de
Bonté' which had become famous, the
147 illustrations of 'Femme à 100 têtes' from 1929 or 'Rêve d'une petite
fille qui voulut entrer au Carmel' from 1930 all
provide quite enough testimony. As an outsider, Max Ernst had preserved, not without wit or
black humor, a substantial
freedom of expression, which would not make his life any easier. This also held true for artistic
endeavors. When Breton
personally attacked Eluard, Ernst had backed the poet, proclaiming himself in solidarity with
him, and had distanced
himself from the Surrealist circle by 1938. When Ernst was arrested in France in 1938 as a
'foreign enemy', it was Eluard
who defended him. The way out lead, as for many others in 1941, through Spain and Portugal
to the USA. Before
departure, the artists inevitably met again, and it was in Marseille, as if ready to jump off the
edge of a cliff: Max Ernst,
André Breton, René Char, Benjamin Péret, Wilfredo Lam, Oscar
Domínguez, Jacque Hérold and Marcel Duchamp. Max
Ernst reached New York through Spain, together with Peggy Guggenheim.
Max Ernst was bound in life-long friendship with
Paul Eluard - as well as with Arp - through a 'harmony of feeling and
thought'. There are wonderful documents of later encounters. Max Ernst held that there was a
stockpile of unused
painting material in his subconscious, a hidden chain of irrational knowledge, poetic objectivity
(hence the 'peinture
automatique' which had so fascinated him), as a fountain of direct expression. Here the
concepts of Joan Miró and Max
Ernst came together, and here also began, as we know, Abstract Expressionism. All of this
makes the creative thinking
of Max Ernst important in the 20th century.
Surrealism as well as Dadaism, whose principal
representative remained Max Ernst, brought about lasting friendships.
In 1949, he still created etchings for Tristan Tzara's 'Monsieur AA l'Antiphilosophe' and a year
later a lithograph of his
was published for Joe Bousquet and Michel Tapié, writers who had commented on Max
Ernst's works early on. His
friendships with contemporary poets, even in the 50's and 60's, inspired breathtaking prints in
answer to their poetry and
texts, as if it were their first encounter. And the self-renewing bird motif accompanied him to
the end. A funny story
comes to mind at the acceptance of an honorary doctorate in the 70's (cassette recording, Jean
Arp Archives).
Enraptured, Max Ernst speaks of birds, in particular of a type of magpie which is famous
because of its habit of
gathering only blue objects and laying them out somewhere as if on exhibit, in order to attract
the attention of the
female. His grin upon discovery of this fact of nature was surely meant for the similarity with
art. ek
On his
prints
Available from Grafos Verlag are four color lithographs
by Max Ernst, prints which form part of the legacy of art
history. To this we can add six lithographs accompanying poetry in the form of a book,
published by the Brunidor
Publishing House, Vaduz/Paris. One need only open one of the many catalogues and
monographs on the work of Max
Ernst to see these works in context. With these top-quality graphic prints, an exciting window
is opened, a retrospective
view of modern art. It is not surprising that in this small selection, birds are the protagonists.
Max Ernst had a special
relationship with birds. He created his own personal ornithology. Under the title 'Loplop stellt
vor' (Loplop presents), he
made many paintings and collage series early on. Loplop is a bird-like creature with which Max
Ernst identified, his
alter-ego. 'This creature of Surrealism and painting embodies the instinct which blindly but
surely stands behind
automatic painting', remarked John Russell in his well-known writings, which stem from year
after year of close
collaboration with Max Ernst, and is thus the text of an insider. That painting is created through
the effects of a
concealed ego, an ego that is much more rare than we would generally suppose, was clear for
Max Ernst. Thus the egg
corresponds to the eyeball and the bird the images captured by the eye. This artist is the master
of the eye. He is the
master of the bird as well. The bird is the epitome of the 'powers of imagination'.
Also in the title 'Le Parquet se soulève' (The
Parquet Rises Up), several phenomenon are concealed. During a sojourn in
Bretagne, on a rainy summer day in Saint Paul Roux in the early 20's, while gazing at the
floorboards of an old hallway,
Max Ernst was struck with the idea of rubbing the wooden boards on paper, so as to let himself
be inspired by the grain.
Already in childhood he had been fascinated by the mahogany paneling. And so the technique
of frottage was introduced
into modern art. Max Ernst writes about this in 'Jenseits der Malerei' (Au-delà de la
peinture / Beyond Painting), a book
that he published in 1937. From then on, this rubbing technique, frottage, would most decisively
characterize his style,
along with collage, grattage (a scratching technique), empreinte and décalcomanie (a
sort of copying or tracing
technique), as well as expressive paint-dripping (essential for later Action Painting). The grain
(of both organic and
mineral structures) appears under the Surreal eye and becomes the false floor of the imaginary.
ek
|
|